On 01/15, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t 
> *lock)
>       __ticket_t head = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head);
>  
>       for (;;) {
> -             struct __raw_tickets tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> +             struct __raw_tickets tmp = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets);

Agreed, but what about another ACCESS_ONCE() above?

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to