2015-01-30 10:18+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 29/01/2015 22:48, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > +static inline bool
> > +apic_logical_id(struct kvm_apic_map *map, u32 ldr, u16 *cid, u16 *lid)
> > {
> > + switch (map->mode) {
> > + case KVM_APIC_MODE_XAPIC_FLAT:
> > + *cid = 0;
> > + *lid = ldr & 0xff;
> > + return true;
> > + case KVM_APIC_MODE_XAPIC_CLUSTER:
> > + *cid = (ldr >> 4) & 0xf;
> > + *lid = ldr & 0xf;
> > + return true;
> > + case KVM_APIC_MODE_X2APIC:
> > + *cid = ldr >> 16;
> > + *lid = ldr & 0xffff;
> > + return true;
> > + }
>
> We need some optimization here. You can make the defines equal to the
> size of the lid: CLUSTER = 1 << 3, FLAT = 1 << 2, X2APIC = 1 << 4:
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(...FLAT != 4);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(...CLUSTER != 8);
(Swapped.)
> BUILD_BUG_ON(...X2APIC != 16);
(Check the mode and return false here.)
> lid_bits = mode;
> cid_bits = mode & (16 | 4);
> lid_mask = (1 << lid_bits) - 1;
> cid_mask = (1 << cid_bits) - 1;
>
> *cid = (ldr >> lid_bits) & cid_mask;
> *lid = ldr & lid_mask;
Would jump predictor fail on the switch? Or is size of the code that
important? This code is shorter, but is going to execute far more
operations, so I think it would be slower ... (And harder to read.)
> Please move this to lapic.c since you are at it.
Ok.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
