On 04/02/2015 14:05, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> > >> > Could this also be part of the "things" that KVM can choose to enable, >> > even though it's not a facility? > Can you re-ask that question? Not sure what you want to know. > > This is mostly a fixup for z13, which wants to have a bigger control block. > but > this block is not guest visible.
Okay, this is what I was asking. If the block is not guest visible that's fine. What happens if the guest executes PQAP(QCI)? Paolo > Talking about key wrapping, this is actually masked via a facility bit (for > MSA-3 > and MSA-4), therefore we have the test_vfacility thing in that function. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
