2015-03-02 12:04-0600, Joel Schopp: > Currently kvm_emulate() skips the instruction but kvm_emulate_* sometimes > don't. The end reult is the caller ends up doing the skip themselves. > Let's make them consistant. > > Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp <joel.sch...@amd.com> > --- > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > @@ -4995,7 +4995,7 @@ static int handle_rmode_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > if (emulate_instruction(vcpu, 0) == EMULATE_DONE) { > if (vcpu->arch.halt_request) { > vcpu->arch.halt_request = 0; > - return kvm_emulate_halt(vcpu); > + return kvm_emulate_halt_noskip(vcpu);
noskip is used without being declared ... it shouldn't compile. *_noskip makes the usual case harder to undertand: we just want to halt the vcpu, so name it more directly ... like kvm_vcpu_halt()? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html