On 07/09/15 21:11, Bandan Das wrote: > Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> writes: > ... >>>> >>>> First, see my comments on the KVM patch. >>>> >>>> Second, ram_size is not the right thing to compare. What should be >>>> checked is whether the highest guest-physical address that maps to RAM >>>> can be represented in the address width of the host processor (and only >>>> if EPT is enabled, but that sub-condition belongs to the KVM patch). >>>> >>>> Note that this is not the same as the check written in the patch. For >>>> example, if you assume a 32-bit PCI hole with size 1 GB, then a total >>>> guest RAM of size 63 GB will result in the highest guest-phys memory >>>> address being 0xF_FFFF_FFFF, which just fits into 36 bits. >>>> >>>> Correspondingly, the above code would not print the warning for >>>> >>>> -m $((63 * 1024 + 1)) >>>> >>>> on my laptop (which has "address sizes : 36 bits physical, ..."), even >>>> though such a guest would not boot for me (with EPT enabled). >>>> >>>> Please see >>>> >>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.tianocore.devel/15418/focus=15447 >>>> >>>> So, "ram_size" in the controlling expression should be replaced with >>>> "maximum_guest_ram_address" (which should be inclusive, and the <= relop >>>> should be preserved). >>> also with memory hotplug tuned on we should check if the end of >>> hotplug memory area is less then limit, i.e.: >>> >>> pcms->hotplug_memory.base + hotplug_mem_size < 1ULL << max_phys_bits >> >> Seems reasonable, thanks for the hint! > > Thanks Igor and Laszlo, makes sense. I am wondering if this 1GB PCI > hole is always fixed so that I can simply include that in calculating the > maximum > guest ram address ? Or do we have to figure that out every time ?
Please grep the tree for "above_4g_mem_size". The size of the 32-bit PCI hole is not constant, but all the necessary computation goes into "above_4g_mem_size" already. So I think you should derive the max possible gpa from "above_4g_mem_size" and the top of the hotpluggable memory area, and compare that against the PCPU address width, *if* EPT is enabled. (BTW "pcms->hotplug_memory.base" depends on "above_4g_mem_size" too.) Thanks Laszlo > >> (The LHS in this instance is exclusive though, so equality should *not* >> trigger the warning. "maximum_guest_ram_address" is inclusive, and >> equality should trigger the warning. (Although equality seems quite >> impossible in practice.)) >> >> Thanks! >> Laszlo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html