On 06/08/2015 19:05, Nicholas Krause wrote: > This fixes the assumption that kvm_set_irq_routing is always run > successfully by instead making it equal to the variable r which > we use for returning in the function kvm_arch_vm_ioctl instead > of making r equal to zero when calling this particular function > and incorrectly making the caller of kvm_arch_vm_ioctl think > the function has run successfully. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofo...@gmail.com> > --- > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > index f32f843..660860f 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > @@ -879,8 +879,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, > if (kvm->arch.use_irqchip) { > /* Set up dummy routing. */ > memset(&routing, 0, sizeof(routing)); > - kvm_set_irq_routing(kvm, &routing, 0, 0); > - r = 0; > + r = kvm_set_irq_routing(kvm, &routing, 0, 0); > } > break; > } >
Seems good. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html