On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:25:45 +0800
Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 09/11/2015 03:46 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:17:35 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote:

> >> +
> >> +  /* When length is ignored, MMIO is also put on a separate bus, for
> >> +   * faster lookups.
> >> +   */
> >> +  if (!args->len && !(args->flags & KVM_IOEVENTFD_FLAG_PIO)) {
> > Dito on a positive check for bus_idx == KVM_MMIO_BUS.
> 
> I was thinking maybe this should be done in a separate patch on top.
> What's your opinion?

The check is an independent issue, an extra patch is fine (current
usage does not trigger any problems).

> 
> >> +          ret = kvm_assign_ioeventfd_idx(kvm, KVM_FAST_MMIO_BUS, args);
> >> +          if (ret < 0)
> >> +                  goto fast_fail;
> >> +  }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to