Hi Suresh,

Sorry for the noise!

Do you have a git tree that the robot can monitor and test?

In this case of one patchset depending on another, there is no chance
for the robot to do valid testing based on emailed patches.

Thanks,
Fengguang

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:16:06AM -0500, Suresh E. Warrier wrote:
> This patch set depends upon a previous patch set that I had submitted to
> linux-ppc. The URL for that is:
> 
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2015-October/135794.html
> 
> -suresh
> 
> On 10/29/2015 11:52 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Suresh,
> > 
> > [auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, 
> > please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
> > 
> > url:    
> > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Suresh-Warrier/KVM-PPC-Book3S-HV-Optimize-wakeup-VCPU-from-H_IPI/20151030-081329
> > config: powerpc-defconfig (attached as .config)
> > reproduce:
> >         wget 
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
> >  -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         make.cross ARCH=powerpc 
> > 
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > 
> >    arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c: In function 'icp_rm_set_vcpu_irq':
> >>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c:142:4: error: implicit declaration 
> >>> of function 'smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass' 
> >>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >        smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass(hcpu,
> >        ^
> >    arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c:143:7: error: 
> > 'PPC_MSG_RM_HOST_ACTION' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >           PPC_MSG_RM_HOST_ACTION);
> >           ^
> >    arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c:143:7: note: each undeclared 
> > identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> >    cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > 
> > vim +/smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass +142 
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c
> > 
> >    136                      hcore = -1;
> >    137                      if (kvmppc_host_rm_ops_hv)
> >    138                              hcore = 
> > find_available_hostcore(XICS_RM_KICK_VCPU);
> >    139                      if (hcore != -1) {
> >    140                              hcpu = hcore << threads_shift;
> >    141                              
> > kvmppc_host_rm_ops_hv->rm_core[hcore].rm_data = vcpu;
> >  > 142                              smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass(hcpu,
> >    143                                                      
> > PPC_MSG_RM_HOST_ACTION);
> >    144                      } else {
> >    145                              this_icp->rm_action |= 
> > XICS_RM_KICK_VCPU;
> > 
> > ---
> > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology 
> > Center
> > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel 
> > Corporation
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list
> kbuild-...@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild-all
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to