On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:03:52PM +0300, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> This function takes stage-II physical addresses (A.K.A. IPA), on input, not
> real physical addresses. This causes kvm_is_device_pfn() to return wrong
> values, depending on how much guest and host memory maps match. This
> results in completely broken KVM on some boards. The problem has been
> caught on Samsung proprietary hardware.
>
> Cc: [email protected]
cc'ing stable doesn't make sense here as the bug was introduced in
v4.4-rc3 and we didn't release v4.4 yet...
> Fixes: e6fab5442345 ("ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's uncachedness")
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> index 7dace90..51ad98f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ static void stage2_flush_ptes(struct kvm *kvm, pmd_t *pmd,
>
> pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
> do {
> - if (!pte_none(*pte) && !kvm_is_device_pfn(__phys_to_pfn(addr)))
> + if (!pte_none(*pte) &&
> + (pte_val(*pte) & PAGE_S2_DEVICE) != PAGE_S2_DEVICE)
> kvm_flush_dcache_pte(*pte);
> } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
> }
You are right that there was a bug in the fix, but your fix is not the
right one.
Either we have to apply an actual mask and the compare against the value
(yes, I know, because of the UXN bit we get lucky so far, but that's too
brittle), or we should do a translation fo the gfn to a pfn. Is there
anything preventing us to do the following?
if (!pte_none(*pte) && !kvm_is_device_pfn(pte_pfn(*pte)))
-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
