Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> writes:
> From: Asias He <as...@redhat.com>
>
> VM sockets vhost transport implementation. This module runs in host
> kernel.
As per previous checkpatch comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Asias He <as...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
> ---
> v3:
> * Remove unneeded variable used to store return value
> (Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> and Julia Lawall
> <julia.law...@lip6.fr>)
> v2:
> * Add missing total_tx_buf decrement
> * Support flexible rx/tx descriptor layout
> * Refuse to assign reserved CIDs
> * Refuse guest CID if already in use
> * Only accept correctly addressed packets
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 628
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/vhost/vsock.h | 4 +
> 2 files changed, 632 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/vsock.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3c0034a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,628 @@
> +/*
> + * vhost transport for vsock
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013-2015 Red Hat, Inc.
> + * Author: Asias He <as...@redhat.com>
> + * Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.
> + */
> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <net/sock.h>
> +#include <linux/virtio_vsock.h>
> +#include <linux/vhost.h>
> +
> +#include <net/af_vsock.h>
> +#include "vhost.h"
> +#include "vsock.h"
> +
> +#define VHOST_VSOCK_DEFAULT_HOST_CID 2
> +
> +static int vhost_transport_socket_init(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> + struct vsock_sock *psk);
> +
> +enum {
> + VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES,
> +};
> +
> +/* Used to track all the vhost_vsock instances on the system. */
> +static LIST_HEAD(vhost_vsock_list);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(vhost_vsock_mutex);
> +
> +struct vhost_vsock_virtqueue {
> + struct vhost_virtqueue vq;
> +};
> +
> +struct vhost_vsock {
> + /* Vhost device */
> + struct vhost_dev dev;
> + /* Vhost vsock virtqueue*/
> + struct vhost_vsock_virtqueue vqs[VSOCK_VQ_MAX];
> + /* Link to global vhost_vsock_list*/
> + struct list_head list;
> + /* Head for pkt from host to guest */
> + struct list_head send_pkt_list;
> + /* Work item to send pkt */
> + struct vhost_work send_pkt_work;
> + /* Wait queue for send pkt */
> + wait_queue_head_t queue_wait;
> + /* Used for global tx buf limitation */
> + u32 total_tx_buf;
> + /* Guest contex id this vhost_vsock instance handles */
> + u32 guest_cid;
> +};
As with 2/4 there is a fair bit of redundancy in the comments but I
don't see any obvious grouping here that could streamline it.
> +
> +static u32 vhost_transport_get_local_cid(void)
> +{
> + return VHOST_VSOCK_DEFAULT_HOST_CID;
> +}
> +
> +static struct vhost_vsock *vhost_vsock_get(u32 guest_cid)
> +{
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(vsock, &vhost_vsock_list, list) {
> + if (vsock->guest_cid == guest_cid) {
> + mutex_unlock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> + return vsock;
> + }
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> + bool added = false;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> + vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> + for (;;) {
> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> + struct iov_iter iov_iter;
> + unsigned out, in;
> + struct sock *sk;
> + size_t nbytes;
> + size_t len;
> + int head;
> +
> + if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
> + vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
> + &out, &in, NULL, NULL);
> + pr_debug("%s: head = %d\n", __func__, head);
> + if (head < 0)
> + break;
> +
> + if (head == vq->num) {
> + if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq))) {
> + vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> + continue;
Why are we doing this? If we enable something we then disable it? A
comment as to what is going on here would be useful.
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + pkt = list_first_entry(&vsock->send_pkt_list,
> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt, list);
> + list_del_init(&pkt->list);
> +
> + if (out) {
> + virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> + vq_err(vq, "Expected 0 output buffers, got %u\n", out);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + len = iov_length(&vq->iov[out], in);
> + iov_iter_init(&iov_iter, READ, &vq->iov[out], in, len);
> +
> + nbytes = copy_to_iter(&pkt->hdr, sizeof(pkt->hdr), &iov_iter);
> + if (nbytes != sizeof(pkt->hdr)) {
> + virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> + vq_err(vq, "Faulted on copying pkt hdr\n");
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + nbytes = copy_to_iter(pkt->buf, pkt->len, &iov_iter);
> + if (nbytes != pkt->len) {
> + virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> + vq_err(vq, "Faulted on copying pkt buf\n");
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + vhost_add_used(vq, head, pkt->len); /* TODO should this
> be sizeof(pkt->hdr) + pkt->len? */
TODO needs sorting our or removing.
> + added = true;
> +
> + virtio_transport_dec_tx_pkt(pkt);
> + vsock->total_tx_buf -= pkt->len;
> +
> + sk = sk_vsock(pkt->trans->vsk);
> + /* Release refcnt taken in vhost_transport_send_pkt */
> + sock_put(sk);
> +
> + virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> + }
> + if (added)
> + vhost_signal(&vsock->dev, vq);
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> +
> + if (added)
> + wake_up(&vsock->queue_wait);
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_transport_send_pkt_work(struct vhost_work *work)
> +{
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
> +
> + vsock = container_of(work, struct vhost_vsock, send_pkt_work);
> + vq = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX].vq;
> +
> + vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(vsock, vq);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +vhost_transport_send_pkt(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info)
> +{
> + u32 src_cid, src_port, dst_cid, dst_port;
> + struct virtio_transport *trans;
> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
> + u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len;
> + DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +
> + src_cid = vhost_transport_get_local_cid();
> + src_port = vsk->local_addr.svm_port;
> + if (!info->remote_cid) {
> + dst_cid = vsk->remote_addr.svm_cid;
> + dst_port = vsk->remote_addr.svm_port;
> + } else {
> + dst_cid = info->remote_cid;
> + dst_port = info->remote_port;
> + }
> +
> + /* Find the vhost_vsock according to guest context id */
> + vsock = vhost_vsock_get(dst_cid);
> + if (!vsock)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + trans = vsk->trans;
> + vq = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX].vq;
> +
> + /* we can send less than pkt_len bytes */
> + if (pkt_len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_RX_BUF_SIZE)
> + pkt_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_RX_BUF_SIZE;
> +
> + /* virtio_transport_get_credit might return less than pkt_len credit */
> + pkt_len = virtio_transport_get_credit(trans, pkt_len);
> +
> + /* Do not send zero length OP_RW pkt*/
> + if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW)
> + return pkt_len;
> +
> + /* Respect global tx buf limitation */
> + mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> + while (pkt_len + vsock->total_tx_buf >
> VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_TX_BUF_SIZE) {
I'm curious about the relationship between
VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_RX_BUF_SIZE above and VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_TX_BUF_SIZE
just here. Why do we need to limit pkt_len to the smaller when really
all that matters is pkt_len + vsock->total_tx_buf >
VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_TX_BUF_SIZE?
> + prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&vsock->queue_wait, &wait,
> + TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> + schedule();
> + mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> + finish_wait(&vsock->queue_wait, &wait);
> + }
> + vsock->total_tx_buf += pkt_len;
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> +
> + pkt = virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(vsk, info, pkt_len,
> + src_cid, src_port,
> + dst_cid, dst_port);
> + if (!pkt) {
> + mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> + vsock->total_tx_buf -= pkt_len;
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> + virtio_transport_put_credit(trans, pkt_len);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + pr_debug("%s:info->pkt_len= %d\n", __func__, pkt_len);
> + /* Released in vhost_transport_do_send_pkt */
> + sock_hold(&trans->vsk->sk);
> + virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(pkt);
> +
> + /* Queue it up in vhost work */
> + mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> + list_add_tail(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list);
> + vhost_work_queue(&vsock->dev, &vsock->send_pkt_work);
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> +
> + return pkt_len;
> +}
> +
> +static struct virtio_transport_pkt_ops vhost_ops = {
> + .send_pkt = vhost_transport_send_pkt,
> +};
> +
> +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *
> +vhost_vsock_alloc_pkt(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> + unsigned int out, unsigned int in)
> +{
> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> + struct iov_iter iov_iter;
> + size_t nbytes;
> + size_t len;
> +
> + if (in != 0) {
> + vq_err(vq, "Expected 0 input buffers, got %u\n", in);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + pkt = kzalloc(sizeof(*pkt), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pkt)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + len = iov_length(vq->iov, out);
> + iov_iter_init(&iov_iter, WRITE, vq->iov, out, len);
> +
> + nbytes = copy_from_iter(&pkt->hdr, sizeof(pkt->hdr), &iov_iter);
> + if (nbytes != sizeof(pkt->hdr)) {
> + vq_err(vq, "Expected %zu bytes for pkt->hdr, got %zu bytes\n",
> + sizeof(pkt->hdr), nbytes);
> + kfree(pkt);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + if (le16_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.type) == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM)
> + pkt->len = le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.len);
> +
> + /* No payload */
> + if (!pkt->len)
> + return pkt;
> +
> + /* The pkt is too big */
> + if (pkt->len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE) {
> + kfree(pkt);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + pkt->buf = kmalloc(pkt->len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pkt->buf) {
> + kfree(pkt);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + nbytes = copy_from_iter(pkt->buf, pkt->len, &iov_iter);
> + if (nbytes != pkt->len) {
> + vq_err(vq, "Expected %u byte payload, got %zu bytes\n",
> + pkt->len, nbytes);
> + virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return pkt;
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_vsock_handle_ctl_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
> +{
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
> + poll.work);
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_vsock,
> + dev);
> +
> + pr_debug("%s vq=%p, vsock=%p\n", __func__, vq, vsock);
> +}
This doesn't handle anything, it just prints debug stuff. Should this be
a NOP function?
> +
> +static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
> +{
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
> + poll.work);
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_vsock,
> + dev);
> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> + int head;
> + unsigned int out, in;
> + bool added = false;
> + u32 len;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> + vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> + for (;;) {
> + head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
> + &out, &in, NULL, NULL);
> + if (head < 0)
> + break;
> +
> + if (head == vq->num) {
> + if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq))) {
> + vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> + continue;
Same question about the enable/disable dance as above.
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + pkt = vhost_vsock_alloc_pkt(vq, out, in);
> + if (!pkt) {
> + vq_err(vq, "Faulted on pkt\n");
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + len = pkt->len;
> +
> + /* Only accept correctly addressed packets */
> + if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid) == vsock->guest_cid &&
> + le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid) ==
> vhost_transport_get_local_cid())
> + virtio_transport_recv_pkt(pkt);
> + else
> + virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> +
> + vhost_add_used(vq, head, len);
> + added = true;
> + }
> + if (added)
> + vhost_signal(&vsock->dev, vq);
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_vsock_handle_rx_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
> +{
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
> + poll.work);
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_vsock,
> + dev);
> +
> + vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(vsock, vq);
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_vsock_dev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct vhost_virtqueue **vqs;
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
> + int ret;
> +
> + vsock = kzalloc(sizeof(*vsock), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vsock)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s:vsock=%p\n", __func__, vsock);
> +
> + vqs = kmalloc(VSOCK_VQ_MAX * sizeof(*vqs), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vqs) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + vqs[VSOCK_VQ_CTRL] = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_CTRL].vq;
> + vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX] = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX].vq;
> + vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX] = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX].vq;
> + vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_CTRL].vq.handle_kick = vhost_vsock_handle_ctl_kick;
> + vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX].vq.handle_kick = vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick;
> + vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX].vq.handle_kick = vhost_vsock_handle_rx_kick;
> +
> + vhost_dev_init(&vsock->dev, vqs, VSOCK_VQ_MAX);
> +
> + file->private_data = vsock;
> + init_waitqueue_head(&vsock->queue_wait);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vsock->send_pkt_list);
> + vhost_work_init(&vsock->send_pkt_work, vhost_transport_send_pkt_work);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> + list_add_tail(&vsock->list, &vhost_vsock_list);
> + mutex_unlock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> + return 0;
> +
> +out:
> + kfree(vsock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_vsock_flush(struct vhost_vsock *vsock)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < VSOCK_VQ_MAX; i++)
> + vhost_poll_flush(&vsock->vqs[i].vq.poll);
> + vhost_work_flush(&vsock->dev, &vsock->send_pkt_work);
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_vsock_dev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock = file->private_data;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> + list_del(&vsock->list);
> + mutex_unlock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> +
> + vhost_dev_stop(&vsock->dev);
> + vhost_vsock_flush(vsock);
> + vhost_dev_cleanup(&vsock->dev, false);
> + kfree(vsock->dev.vqs);
> + kfree(vsock);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_vsock_set_cid(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u32 guest_cid)
> +{
> + struct vhost_vsock *other;
> +
> + /* Refuse reserved CIDs */
> + if (guest_cid <= VMADDR_CID_HOST) {
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Refuse if CID is already in use */
> + other = vhost_vsock_get(guest_cid);
> + if (other && other != vsock) {
> + return -EADDRINUSE;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> + vsock->guest_cid = guest_cid;
> + pr_debug("%s:guest_cid=%d\n", __func__, guest_cid);
> + mutex_unlock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_vsock_set_features(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 features)
> +{
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (features & ~VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> + if ((features & (1 << VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) &&
> + !vhost_log_access_ok(&vsock->dev)) {
> + mutex_unlock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < VSOCK_VQ_MAX; i++) {
> + vq = &vsock->vqs[i].vq;
> + mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> + vq->acked_features = features;
Is this a user supplied flag? Should it be masked to valid values?
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock = f->private_data;
> + void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
> + u64 __user *featurep = argp;
> + u32 __user *cidp = argp;
> + u32 guest_cid;
> + u64 features;
> + int r;
> +
> + switch (ioctl) {
> + case VHOST_VSOCK_SET_GUEST_CID:
> + if (get_user(guest_cid, cidp))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return vhost_vsock_set_cid(vsock, guest_cid);
> + case VHOST_GET_FEATURES:
> + features = VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES;
> + if (copy_to_user(featurep, &features, sizeof(features)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return 0;
> + case VHOST_SET_FEATURES:
> + if (copy_from_user(&features, featurep, sizeof(features)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return vhost_vsock_set_features(vsock, features);
> + default:
> + mutex_lock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> + r = vhost_dev_ioctl(&vsock->dev, ioctl, argp);
> + if (r == -ENOIOCTLCMD)
> + r = vhost_vring_ioctl(&vsock->dev, ioctl, argp);
> + else
> + vhost_vsock_flush(vsock);
> + mutex_unlock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> + return r;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations vhost_vsock_fops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .open = vhost_vsock_dev_open,
> + .release = vhost_vsock_dev_release,
> + .llseek = noop_llseek,
> + .unlocked_ioctl = vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl,
> +};
> +
> +static struct miscdevice vhost_vsock_misc = {
> + .minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
> + .name = "vhost-vsock",
> + .fops = &vhost_vsock_fops,
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +vhost_transport_socket_init(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
> +{
> + struct virtio_transport *trans;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = virtio_transport_do_socket_init(vsk, psk);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + trans = vsk->trans;
> + trans->ops = &vhost_ops;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct vsock_transport vhost_transport = {
> + .get_local_cid = vhost_transport_get_local_cid,
> +
> + .init = vhost_transport_socket_init,
> + .destruct = virtio_transport_destruct,
> + .release = virtio_transport_release,
> + .connect = virtio_transport_connect,
> + .shutdown = virtio_transport_shutdown,
> +
> + .dgram_enqueue = virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue,
> + .dgram_dequeue = virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue,
> + .dgram_bind = virtio_transport_dgram_bind,
> + .dgram_allow = virtio_transport_dgram_allow,
> +
> + .stream_enqueue = virtio_transport_stream_enqueue,
> + .stream_dequeue = virtio_transport_stream_dequeue,
> + .stream_has_data = virtio_transport_stream_has_data,
> + .stream_has_space = virtio_transport_stream_has_space,
> + .stream_rcvhiwat = virtio_transport_stream_rcvhiwat,
> + .stream_is_active = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
> + .stream_allow = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
> +
> + .notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
> + .notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
> + .notify_recv_init = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
> + .notify_recv_pre_block = virtio_transport_notify_recv_pre_block,
> + .notify_recv_pre_dequeue = virtio_transport_notify_recv_pre_dequeue,
> + .notify_recv_post_dequeue = virtio_transport_notify_recv_post_dequeue,
> + .notify_send_init = virtio_transport_notify_send_init,
> + .notify_send_pre_block = virtio_transport_notify_send_pre_block,
> + .notify_send_pre_enqueue = virtio_transport_notify_send_pre_enqueue,
> + .notify_send_post_enqueue = virtio_transport_notify_send_post_enqueue,
> +
> + .set_buffer_size = virtio_transport_set_buffer_size,
> + .set_min_buffer_size = virtio_transport_set_min_buffer_size,
> + .set_max_buffer_size = virtio_transport_set_max_buffer_size,
> + .get_buffer_size = virtio_transport_get_buffer_size,
> + .get_min_buffer_size = virtio_transport_get_min_buffer_size,
> + .get_max_buffer_size = virtio_transport_get_max_buffer_size,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init vhost_vsock_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = vsock_core_init(&vhost_transport);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + return misc_register(&vhost_vsock_misc);
> +};
> +
> +static void __exit vhost_vsock_exit(void)
> +{
> + misc_deregister(&vhost_vsock_misc);
> + vsock_core_exit();
> +};
> +
> +module_init(vhost_vsock_init);
> +module_exit(vhost_vsock_exit);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Asias He");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("vhost transport for vsock ");
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.h b/drivers/vhost/vsock.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0ddb107
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +#ifndef VHOST_VSOCK_H
> +#define VHOST_VSOCK_H
> +#define VHOST_VSOCK_SET_GUEST_CID _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x60, __u32)
> +#endif
> --
> 2.5.0
--
Alex Bennée
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
