On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 01:30:23PM -0600, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:53:36PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > We can now explicitly mark a unit-test as skipped.
> > If all unit-tests were skipped, the whole test is reported as skipped as
> > well. This also includes the case where no tests were run, but still
> > ended with report_summary().
> >
> > When the whole test is skipped, ./run_tests.sh prints yellow "SKIP"
> > instead of green "PASS".
> >
> > Return value of 77 is used to please Autotools. I also renamed few
> > things in reporting code and chose to refactor a logic while at it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - turned skip into yellow SKIP [Drew]
> > - wrapped line at 80 characters [Drew]
> > - added static to va_report
> >
> > lib/libcflat.h | 1 +
> > lib/report.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > scripts/run.bash | 12 +++++++-----
> > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/libcflat.h b/lib/libcflat.h
> > index 9747ccdbc9f1..070818354ee1 100644
> > --- a/lib/libcflat.h
> > +++ b/lib/libcflat.h
> > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ void report_prefix_push(const char *prefix);
> > void report_prefix_pop(void);
> > void report(const char *msg_fmt, bool pass, ...);
> > void report_xfail(const char *msg_fmt, bool xfail, bool pass, ...);
> > +void report_skip(const char *msg_fmt, ...);
> > int report_summary(void);
> >
> > #define ARRAY_SIZE(_a) (sizeof(_a)/sizeof((_a)[0]))
> > diff --git a/lib/report.c b/lib/report.c
> > index 35e664108a92..a47f2e00b529 100644
> > --- a/lib/report.c
> > +++ b/lib/report.c
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> > #include "libcflat.h"
> > #include "asm/spinlock.h"
> >
> > -static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures;
> > +static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, skipped;
> > static char prefixes[256];
> > static struct spinlock lock;
> >
> > @@ -43,25 +43,28 @@ void report_prefix_pop(void)
> > spin_unlock(&lock);
> > }
> >
> > -void va_report_xfail(const char *msg_fmt, bool xfail, bool cond, va_list
> > va)
> > +static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt, bool pass, bool xfail, bool
> > skip,
> > + va_list va)
>
> Making this static disallows unit test writers to create their own
> variable arg report() wrapper functions. Perhaps to determine whether
> or not a skip is in order, e.g.
>
> xyz_report(msg, pass, ...)
> {
> va_list va;
> va_start(va, pass);
> if (xyz)
> va_report(msg, pass, false, false, va);
> else
> va_report(msg, false, false, true, va);
> va_end(va);
> }
Hmm, while I still think we should avoid using static, to allow new wrappers,
the wrapper I wrote here as an example wouldn't be necessary if report_skip's
inputs were instead
void report_skip(const char *msg_fmt, bool pass, bool skip, ...)
Why not do that?
>
> > {
> > - char *pass = xfail ? "XPASS" : "PASS";
> > - char *fail = xfail ? "XFAIL" : "FAIL";
> > char buf[2000];
> > + char *prefix = skip ? "SKIP"
> > + : xfail ? (pass ? "XPASS" : "XFAIL")
> > + : (pass ? "PASS" : "FAIL");
> >
> > spin_lock(&lock);
> >
> > tests++;
> > - printf("%s: ", cond ? pass : fail);
> > + printf("%s: ", prefix);
> > puts(prefixes);
> > vsnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), msg_fmt, va);
> > puts(buf);
> > puts("\n");
> > - if (xfail && cond)
> > - failures++;
> > - else if (xfail)
> > +
> > + if (skip)
> > + skipped++;
> > + else if (xfail && !pass)
> > xfailures++;
> > - else if (!cond)
> > + else if (xfail || !pass)
> > failures++;
> >
> > spin_unlock(&lock);
> > @@ -71,7 +74,7 @@ void report(const char *msg_fmt, bool pass, ...)
> > {
> > va_list va;
> > va_start(va, pass);
> > - va_report_xfail(msg_fmt, false, pass, va);
> > + va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, va);
> > va_end(va);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -79,7 +82,15 @@ void report_xfail(const char *msg_fmt, bool xfail, bool
> > pass, ...)
> > {
> > va_list va;
> > va_start(va, pass);
> > - va_report_xfail(msg_fmt, xfail, pass, va);
> > + va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, va);
> > + va_end(va);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void report_skip(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
> > +{
> > + va_list va;
> > + va_start(va, msg_fmt);
> > + va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, true, va);
> > va_end(va);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -89,9 +100,14 @@ int report_summary(void)
> >
> > printf("\nSUMMARY: %d tests, %d unexpected failures", tests, failures);
> > if (xfailures)
> > - printf(", %d expected failures\n", xfailures);
> > - else
> > - printf("\n");
> > + printf(", %d expected failures", xfailures);
> > + if (skipped)
> > + printf(", %d skipped", skipped);
> > + printf("\n");
> > +
> > + if (tests == skipped)
> > + return 77; /* blame AUTOTOOLS */
> > +
> > return failures > 0 ? 1 : 0;
> >
> > spin_unlock(&lock);
> > diff --git a/scripts/run.bash b/scripts/run.bash
> > index 243586c6d2fc..b92611c29fbb 100644
> > --- a/scripts/run.bash
> > +++ b/scripts/run.bash
> > @@ -46,11 +46,13 @@ function run()
> > # Unit-tests' return value is shifted by one.
> > ret=$(($? >> 1))
> >
> > - if [ $ret -eq 0 ]; then
> > - echo -e "\e[32mPASS\e[0m $1"
> > - else
> > - echo -e "\e[31mFAIL\e[0m $1"
> > - fi
> > + case $ret in
> > + 0) echo -ne "\e[32mPASS\e[0m" ;;
> > + 77) echo -ne "\e[33mSKIP\e[0m" ;;
> > + *) echo -ne "\e[31mFAIL\e[0m"
> > + esac
> > +
> > + echo " $1"
>
> While touching this, please change this to $testname, and anything
> else in run() that still uses $N instead of its local var name.
>
> >
> > return $ret
> > }
> > --
> > 2.6.4
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> > the body of a message to [email protected]
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
