On 01/05/2016 05:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> smp_mb on vcpu destroy isn't paired with anything, violating pairing
> rules, and seems to be useless.
> 
> Drop it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>

Applied.
(I had to fix this up a little to match kvm/next)

Thanks

> ---
> 
> Untested.
> 
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 8465892..7305d2c 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -1195,7 +1195,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>                   (__u64) vcpu->arch.sie_block)
>                       vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->cpu[vcpu->vcpu_id].sda = 0;
>       }
> -     smp_mb();
> 
>       if (kvm_is_ucontrol(vcpu->kvm))
>               gmap_free(vcpu->arch.gmap);
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to