Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:

1) I'm seeing about 2.3% in scheduler functions [that I recognize].
Does that seems a bit excessive?

Yes, it is. If there is a lot of I/O, this might be due to the thread pool used for I/O.

This is why I wrote the linux-aio patch. It only reduced CPU consumption by about 2% although I'm not sure if that's absolute or relative. Andrew?

Was that before or after the entire path was made copyless?

Before so it's worth updating and trying again.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to