Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 01:57:45PM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>   
>> @@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ int eventfd_signal(struct file *file, int n)
>>  
>>      return n;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eventfd_signal);
>>     
>
> perhaps, but...
>
>   
>> @@ -197,6 +199,7 @@ struct file *eventfd_fget(int fd)
>>  
>>      return file;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eventfd_fget);
>>     
>
> this one looks very odd.  Could you show legitimate users?
>   
Hi Al,

I plan on using this in a similar way as the AIO io_submit function does
today for the next version of the virtual-bus patches.  That is,
userspace allocates an eventfd (in this case, via kvm_irqfd() and the
kernel side code you have been reviewing) and subsequently submits the
fd to a unique virtual-bus instance in the kernel via an ioctl().  This
will ultimately associate the vbus instance dynamically with the kvm
instance in a loosely coupled relationship.  Vbus may be compiled as a
module, thus the export.

-Greg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to