> Craig Metz wrote: > > In message <49d396ab.6090...@redhat.com>, you write: > > > >> Via engineers have contacted me and confirmed that this is a problem in > >> the processor. > >> > > > > Is there a known-fixed CPU revision? > > > > Is there a way to identify working vs. non-working chips, either from IC > > stamp or from /proc/cpuinfo? (Bonus: is it possible to put a check and an > > error > > into the kvm-intel kernel model?) > > > > I have no idea. Please contact Via for this information. >
Hi, I've read an EMail from VIA, telling that the Nano must be at least stepping 3. Prior steppings have a buggy vt implementation... (Damn! I have stepping 2 :-I ) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
