Hi Marcelo, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:02:02PM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > >> Hi Marcelo! >> >> Comments about the shutdown path ambiguity are in-line >> >> Gregory Haskins wrote: >> >>> iosignalfd is a mechanism to register PIO/MMIO regions to trigger an eventfd >>> signal when written to by a guest. Host userspace can register any >>> arbitrary >>> IO address with a corresponding eventfd and then pass the eventfd to a >>> + list_del(&item->list); >>> + iosignalfd_item_free(item); >>> + } >>> + >>> + list_del(&group->list); >>> + kfree(group); >>> +} >>> >>> >> So this function is called by the path that executes as we do the last >> kvm_put_kvm(). I do not do any careful RCU wrangling here because I >> assume that there cannot possibly be any active MMIO/PIO operations at >> this time, or the reference would never have dropped. Let me know if >> anyone sees any holes in that. >> >> An alternative approach is to do this similar to how irqfd_release() >> works. That is: invoke it from the vmfd release() path instead of the >> the kvm object destructor. I currently do not think this is necessary, >> but I will throw that out there in case someone likes it better. >> > > Gregory, > > Can't see any problems with it.
Thanks for the review! > You might want an upper limit > in the number of items per group. > Yeah, I agree that is a good idea. Will fix in v7. BTW: Did your series get merged while I was away? -Greg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
