On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 03:03:53PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Use RCU locking for mask/ack notifiers lists.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c b/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
> index 5dde1ef..ba3a115 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
> @@ -179,18 +179,18 @@ void kvm_notify_acked_irq(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned
> irqchip, unsigned pin)
> break;
> }
> }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
>
> - hlist_for_each_entry(kian, n, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list, link)
> + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(kian, n, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list, link)
> if (kian->gsi == gsi)
> kian->irq_acked(kian);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> void kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian)
> {
> mutex_lock(&kvm->irq_lock);
> - hlist_add_head(&kian->link, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list);
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&kian->link, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list);
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -198,8 +198,9 @@ void kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian)
> {
> mutex_lock(&kvm->irq_lock);
> - hlist_del_init(&kian->link);
> + hlist_del_init_rcu(&kian->link);
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock);
> + synchronize_rcu();
> }
This is done under kvm->lock still, which means the lock might be held
potentially for a very long time. Can synchronize_rcu be moved out of
this lock?
> int kvm_request_irq_source_id(struct kvm *kvm)
> @@ -246,7 +247,7 @@ void kvm_register_irq_mask_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, int
> irq,
> {
> mutex_lock(&kvm->irq_lock);
> kimn->irq = irq;
> - hlist_add_head(&kimn->link, &kvm->mask_notifier_list);
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&kimn->link, &kvm->mask_notifier_list);
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -254,8 +255,9 @@ void kvm_unregister_irq_mask_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
> int irq,
> struct kvm_irq_mask_notifier *kimn)
> {
> mutex_lock(&kvm->irq_lock);
> - hlist_del(&kimn->link);
> + hlist_del_rcu(&kimn->link);
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock);
> + synchronize_rcu();
> }
>
> void kvm_fire_mask_notifiers(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, bool mask)
> @@ -263,11 +265,11 @@ void kvm_fire_mask_notifiers(struct kvm *kvm, int irq,
> bool mask)
> struct kvm_irq_mask_notifier *kimn;
> struct hlist_node *n;
>
> - WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&kvm->irq_lock));
> -
> - hlist_for_each_entry(kimn, n, &kvm->mask_notifier_list, link)
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(kimn, n, &kvm->mask_notifier_list, link)
> if (kimn->irq == irq)
> kimn->func(kimn, mask);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> void kvm_free_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
> --
> 1.6.2.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
