Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote on 03/09/2009 16:39:09:

> From:
>
> Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com>
>
> To:
>
> Orit Wasserman/Haifa/i...@ibmil
>
> Cc:
>
> Abel Gordon/Haifa/i...@ibmil, aligu...@us.ibm.com, Ben-Ami Yassour1/
> Haifa/i...@ibmil, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mm...@us.ibm.com, Muli Ben-
> Yehuda/Haifa/i...@ibmil
>
> Date:
>
> 03/09/2009 16:39
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: [PATCH 1/6] Nested VMX patch 1 implements vmon and vmoff
>
> On 09/03/2009 03:34 PM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
> >
> >> I think we need to mask it with the capabilities we support.
Otherwise
> >> the guest can try to use some new feature which we don't support yet,
> >> and crash.
> >>
> > I agree , but I went over the Intel spec and didn't find any
problematic
> > feature.
> > We may need to consider it in the future.
> >
>
> We need to do it, since we don't know anything about future processors.
OK
>
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to