On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:10 +0800, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 09/14/2009 05:55 AM, Huang Ying wrote: > > Hi, Avi, > > > > On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 17:35 +0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > >>>> (also, I if we can't handle guest-mode SIGBUS I think it would be nice > >>>> to raise it again so the process terminates due to the SIGBUS). > >>>> > >>> For SIGBUS we can not relay to guest as MCE, we can either abort or > >>> reset SIGBUS to SIGDFL and re-raise it. Both are OK for me. You prefer > >>> the latter one? > >>> > >> I think a suitable error message and exit would be better than a plain > >> signal kill. It shouldn't look like qemu crashed due to a software > >> bug. Ideally a error message in a way that it can be parsed by libvirt etc. > >> and reported in a suitable way. > >> > > Do you agree with us about SIGBUS processing? > > > > Yes.
Do you have some other issue for this patch? Best Regards, Huang Ying -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
