On 01/25/2010 02:24 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:12:36PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/25/2010 01:11 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:08:13PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/25/2010 12:01 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On HW task switch newly loaded segments should me marked as accessed.

@@ -4775,6 +4766,11 @@ int kvm_load_segment_descriptor(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
u16 selector,
                        kvm_seg.unusable = 1;

        kvm_set_segment(vcpu,&kvm_seg, seg);
+       if (selector&&    !kvm_seg.unusable&&    kvm_seg.s) {
+               /* mark segment as accessed */
+               seg_desc.type |= 1;
+               save_guest_segment_descriptor(vcpu, selector,&seg_desc);
+       }
        return 0;
  }
What about an error return from s_g_s_d?

What can or should we do about it?

If -EFAULT, propagate to userspace.

We don't handle it anywhere in task switch emulation. Separate patch?


Things like 'return kvm_write_guest_virt()' do handle it.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to