On 22/01/10 23:33, Brian Jackson wrote:
>> 1. I am experiencing a 40% performance hit (600 Mb/s) on each individual >> virtio guest connection ; >> > I don't know what all features RHEL5.4 enables for kvm, but that doesn't seem > outside the realm of possibility. Especially depending on what OS is running > in the guest. I think RHEL5.4 has an older version of virtio, but I won't > swear to it. Fwiw, I get ~1.5Gbps guest to host on a Ubuntu 9.10 guest, > ~850mbit/s guest to host on a Windows 7 guest. To get those speeds, I have to > up the window sizes a good bit (the default is 8K, those numbers are at 1M). > At the default Windows 7 gets ~250mbit/s. > Thank you, Brian ; your reply is much appreciated. I took a shortcut, and installed RHEL's ktune package (on both hosts and guests), which tunes the following parameters : net.core.rmem_default = 262144 net.core.wmem_default = 262144 net.core.rmem_max = 8388608 net.core.wmem_max = 8388608 net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 10000 net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 8192 87380 8388608 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 8192 65536 8388608 net.ipv4.udp_rmem_min = 16384 net.ipv4.udp_wmem_min = 16384 net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 8388608 12582912 16777216 net.ipv4.udp_mem = 8388608 12582912 16777216 vm.swappiness = 30 vm.dirty_ratio = 50 vm.pagecache = 90 Thanks to these changes, external host to guest is up from ~600 Mb/s to the expected ~950 Mb/s (guest to bare metal is still ~1.2Gb/s). >> 2. Total simultaneous bandwidth to all guests seems to be capped at 1 >> Gb/s ; quite problematic, as this renders my server consolidation almost >> useless. >> > I don't know about 802.3ad bonding, but I know the other linux bonding > techniques are very hard to benchmark due to the way the mac's are handled. I > would start by examining/describing your testing a little more. At the very > least what tools you're using to test, etc. would be helpful. > - I am using iperf-2.0.4 for bandwidth testing : "iperf -s" on server side (TCP window size: 85.3 KB) "iperf -c" on client side (TCP window size: 27.5 or 64.0 KB) - Network : * 2x interconnected Allied Telesis AT-x908 (with 60 Gb/s switching backplane) * hostA , 3x 1 Gb 802.3ad , with bridged virtio guests : virtA1-virtA2-virtA3 * hostB , 3x 1 Gb 802.3ad * hostC , 1 Gb * hostD , 1 Gb - Tests (simultaneous connections from clients -> servers in Mb/s) : 1. B,C,D -> A : 990,600,700 Mb/s = 2.3 Gb/s , which confirms a successful 802.3ad setup for hostA 2. B,B,B -> A : 450,300,250 Mb/s = 1 Gb/s : due to MAC handling, maximum bandwidth is maybe limited to 1 Gb/s per host-host connection ? 3. B -> A1 : 980 Mb/s 4. C -> A2 : 650 Mb/s 5. B,B -> A1,A2 : 340,650 Mb/s (limited host-host ?) 6. B,C -> A1,A2 : 900,100 Mb/s 7. B,C,D -> A1,A2,A3 : 750,150,100 Mb/s 8. A1,A2 -> B,B : 500,500 Mb/s (limited host-host ?) 9. A1,A2 -> B,C : 980,730 Mb/s - Results [2], [5] and [8] seem to imply a 1 Gb bandwidth limit for a single physical client-server connection ; - Result [9] indicates > 1Gb/s bandwidth for outgoing virtio client guest connections (to different servers) ; - Results [6] and [7] illustrate the problem : incoming bandwidth to all virtio guests is capped at 1 Gb/s. Best regards, Didier -- Didier Moens , IT services Department for Molecular Biomedical Research (DMBR) VIB - Ghent University -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
