On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:40:32PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:20:39 -0200 > Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > With current code, if a memslot is deleted, access through any aliases > > that use it will fail (BTW it looks this is not properly handled, but > > thats a separate problem). > > > Yea I had some still open concerns about this code (this why I sent it on RFC) > > > > > So AFAICS there is no requirement for an alias to continue "operable" > > if its parent memslot is deleted. > > > With this patch alias will stop to opearte when the parent is deleted > just like the behivor with the current code... > > base_gfn will be set to 0 and npages will be set to 0 as well > (the true values wil be hide in real_base_gfn...), so gfn_to_memslot > and gfn_to_page will fail....
But you adjust the alias (and keep it valid) if dirty logging is enabled? > > > > Or is this a feature you need? > > > I dont need it (I asked Avi to do something), So he said he want to nuke the > aliasing > from kvm and keep supporting the old userspace`s With feature i meant keeping the alias around when parent slot is deleted. > Do you have any other way to achive this? No. > Btw I do realize it might be better not to push this patch and just keep the > old > way of treating aliasing as we have now, I really don`t mind. > > > > > Motivation is that nukeing aliases is simpler than adjusting them. > > > > Agree. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
