On 21.03.2010, at 17:42, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/21/2010 06:37 PM, Thomas Løcke wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Avi Kivity<a...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Tracking git repositories and stable setups are mutually exclusive. If you >>> are interested in something stable I recommend staying with the distribution >>> provided setup (and picking a distribution that has an emphasis on kvm). If >>> you want to track upstream, use qemu-kvm-0.12.x stable releases and >>> kernel.org 2.6.x.y stable releases. If you want to track git repositories, >>> use qemu-kvm.git and kvm.git for the kernel and kvm. >>> >> Thanks Avi. >> >> I will stay with the stable qemu-kvm releases and stable kernel.org >> kernel releases from now on. >> >> I've never heard of any KVM specific distributions. Are you aware of >> any? My primary reason for going with Slackware, is because I already >> know it. But if there are better choices for a KVM virtualization >> host, then I'm willing to switch. >> > > The only kvm-specific distribution I know of is RHEV-H, but that's probably > not what you're looking for. I'm talking about distributions that have an > active kvm package maintainer, update the packages regularly, have bug > trackers that someone looks into, etc. At least Fedora and Ubuntu do this, > perhaps openSuSE as well (though the latter has a stronger Xen emphasis).
Yes, we do. Though openSUSE 11.2 isn't exactly where I want it to be. Expect 11.3 to be a lot better there. Alex-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
