On 04/01/2010 12:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 01.04.2010, at 10:51, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/24/2010 10:48 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Some times we don't want all capabilities to be available to all
our vcpus. One example for that is the OSI interface, implemented
in the next patch.
In order to have a generic mechanism in how to enable capabilities
individually, this patch introduces a new ioctl that can be used
for this purpose. That way features we don't want in all guests or
userspace configurations can just not be enabled and we're good.
Documentation/kvm/api.txt | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/kvm.h | 12 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Should really have been generic instead of ppc-specific, but can be moved later.
I didn't fully understand your comment about stuff being generic vs arch
specific. But I assumed that since you know this ioctl exists now that whenever
someone needs something similar now, it's easy to add support for it on other
archs.
There is nothing arch specific about the interface (though the various
caps can be arch specific). No need to add support, just move the code
to virt/kvm and add an arch specific callout to handle the data.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
