On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 01:22:14PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:39:06AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 04/26/2010 12:59 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >This is now done via the initialization's qemu_system_reset call.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity<a...@redhat.com>
> > >---
> > >  kvm-all.c |    1 -
> > >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> > >index 9c8aa7d..eabb097 100644
> > >--- a/kvm-all.c
> > >+++ b/kvm-all.c
> > >@@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *env)
> > >      ret = kvm_arch_init_vcpu(env);
> > >      if (ret == 0) {
> > >          qemu_register_reset(kvm_reset_vcpu, env);
> > >-        kvm_arch_reset_vcpu(env);
> > >      }
> > >  err:
> > >      return ret;
> > 
> > This breaks -enable-kvm in upstream qemu.  No progress is ever made
> > in the guest.
> 
> These patches have been autotested, and just confirmed manually that    
> this patch does not break -enable-kvm (as the reset handler is now 
> called through the notifier).
> 
> What is your qemu command line?

Just drop it please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to