On 05/04/2010 12:45 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

I was trying to avoid a performance regression relative to the current
code, as it appears that some care was taken to avoid the memory reference.

I agree that it's probably negligible compared to the save/restore
code.  If the x86 maintainers agree as well, I'll replace it with
cpu_has_xsave.

I asked Suresh to comment on this, since he wrote the original code.  He
did confirm that the intent was to avoid a global memory reference.


Ok, so you're happy with the patch as is?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to