On 05/13/2010 03:03 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 05/13/2010 03:01 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 05/13/2010 02:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Mind to give a high level overview on where you're moving which locks?
Um, looks like I forgot to fill in the patchset header. Sorry.
Gar, I actually wrote it but forgot to save the file.
And it had some useful info:
[PATCH 0/7] Consolidate vcpu ioctl locking
In general, all vcpu ioctls need to take the vcpu mutex, but each one
does it
(or not) individually. This is cumbersome and error prone.
This patchset moves all locking to a central place. This is complicated
by the fact that ppc's KVM_INTERRUPT and s390's KVM_S390_INTERRUPT break
the convention and need to run unlocked.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
