On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:24:18AM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 14:44 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 05/27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:04:51PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> > > > Add a new kernel API to create a singlethread workqueue and attach it's
> > > > task to current task's cgroup and cpumask.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <s...@us.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > Could someone familiar with workqueue code please comment on whether
> > > this patch is suitable for 2.6.35?
> > >
> > > It is needed to fix the case where vhost user might cause a kernel
> > > thread to consume more CPU than allowed by the cgroup.
> > > Should I merge it through the vhost tree?
> > > Ack for this?
> >
> > I don't understand the reasons for this patch, but this doesn't matter.
> >
> > I don't really see any need to change workqueue.c,
> >
> > > > +static struct task_struct *get_singlethread_wq_task(struct
> > > > workqueue_struct *wq)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return (per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, singlethread_cpu))->thread;
> > > > +}
> >
> > (Not sure this trivial static helper with the single caller makes sense, but
> > see below)
> >
> > > > +/* Create a singlethread workqueue and attach it's task to the current
> > > > task's
> > > > + * cgroup and set it's cpumask to the current task's cpumask.
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct workqueue_struct
> > > > *create_singlethread_workqueue_in_current_cg(char *name)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> > > > + struct task_struct *task;
> > > > + cpumask_var_t mask;
> > > > +
> > > > + wq = create_singlethread_workqueue(name);
> > > > + if (!wq)
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> > > > + goto err;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (sched_getaffinity(current->pid, mask))
> > > > + goto err;
> > > > +
> > > > + task = get_singlethread_wq_task(wq);
> > > > + if (sched_setaffinity(task->pid, mask))
> > > > + goto err;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (cgroup_attach_task_current_cg(task))
> > > > + goto err;
> > > > +out:
> > > > + return wq;
> > > > +err:
> > > > + destroy_workqueue(wq);
> > > > + wq = NULL;
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > +}
> >
> > Instead, cgroup.c (or whoever needs this) can do
> >
> > struct move_struct {
> > struct work_struct work;
> > int ret;
> > };
> >
> > static void move_func(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> > struct move_struct *move = container_of(...);
> >
> > if (cgroup_attach_task_current_cg(current))
>
> We are trying to attach the task associated with workqueue to the
> current task's cgroup. So what we need is
> cgroup_attach_task_current_cg(wq->task);
>
> However there is no interface currently that exports the task associated
> with a workqueue. It is hidden in cpu_workqueue_struct and is only
> accessible within workqueue.c.
>
>
> > ret = -EANY;
> > }
> >
> > static struct workqueue_struct
> > *create_singlethread_workqueue_in_current_cg(char *name)
> > {
> > struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> > struct move_struct move = {
> > .work = __WORK_INITIALIZER(move_func);
> > };
> >
> > wq = create_singlethread_workqueue(name);
> > if (!wq)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > queue_work(&move.work);
> > flush_work(&move.work);
> >
> > if (move.ret) {
> > destroy_workqueue(wq);
> > wq = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > return wq;
> > }
> >
> > Or. Just export wq_per_cpu() from workqueue.c (probably with a better name)
> > and
> > use it like the patch does.
> This requires that struct cpu_workqueue_struct and struct
> workqueue_struct are made externally visible by moving them to
> kernel/workqueue.h.
>
> Instead what about adding the simple helper get_singlethread_wq_task()
> in workqueue.c and exporting it.
> I can add create_singlethread_workqueue_in_current_cg() to cgroup.c
> using this helper routine.
Or to our driver, if that's more palatable.
> Thanks
> Sridhar
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
