On 06/22/2010 07:32 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 11:11 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
That changes a few things. I bet all the contention we were seeing was
just from nr_to_scan=0 calls and not from actual shrink operations.
Perhaps we should just stop this set after patch 4.
At the very least, we should re-measure things.
Sure. I'll go back to the folks that found this in the first place and
see how these patches affect the contention we were seeing.
Dave, how did those tests go?
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
