On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>  On 08/02/2010 05:46 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> This patch lets the nested vmrun fail if the L1 hypervisor
>> has not intercepted vmrun. This fixes the "vmrun intercept
>> check" unit test.
>
>> +
>>   static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>>   {
>>      struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
>> @@ -2029,6 +2037,17 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>>      if (!nested_vmcb)
>>              return false;
>>
>> +    if (!nested_vmcb_checks(nested_vmcb)) {
>> +            nested_vmcb->control.exit_code    = SVM_EXIT_ERR;
>> +            nested_vmcb->control.exit_code_hi = 0;
>> +            nested_vmcb->control.exit_info_1  = 0;
>> +            nested_vmcb->control.exit_info_2  = 0;
>> +
>> +            nested_svm_unmap(page);
>> +
>> +            return false;
>> +    }
>> +
>
> Don't you have to transfer an injected event to exitintinfo?

APM2 seems to be quiet about this. I just tried it out and event_inj
still contains the event after a failed vmrun on real hardware. This
makes sense because this is no real vmexit because the vm was never
entered.

        Joerg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to