On 16.08.2010, at 15:49, Serge Belyshev wrote:
> Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> writes:
>
>> Hrm - try to use the following (probably whitespace broken and 100%
>> untested) hacky patch:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> index 56c9b6b..bde9ee3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> @@ -429,9 +429,11 @@ static int svm_hardware_enable(void *garbage)
>> struct desc_struct *gdt;
>> int me = raw_smp_processor_id();
>>
>> +#if 0
>> rdmsrl(MSR_EFER, efer);
>> if (efer & EFER_SVME)
>> return -EBUSY;
>> +#endif
>>
>
> I tested a bit different hack keeping rdmsrl but removing the if() and
> it works fine for me:
>
> Index: linux/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -429,8 +429,7 @@ static int svm_hardware_enable(void *gar
> int me = raw_smp_processor_id();
>
> rdmsrl(MSR_EFER, efer);
> - if (efer & EFER_SVME)
> - return -EBUSY;
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "svm_hardware_enable: efer %x on %d\n", efer, me);
Ouch, yes. Thanks for not taking my patch ;). The efer read is of course still
mandatory.
>
> if (!has_svm()) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "svm_hardware_enable: err EOPNOTSUPP on %d\n",
>
> Here is an example of its output:
>
> [231441.358111] svm_hardware_enable: efer 1d01 on 0
> [231441.358117] svm_hardware_enable: efer d01 on 3
> [231441.358124] svm_hardware_enable: efer d01 on 2
> [231441.358135] svm_hardware_enable: efer d01 on 1
> [231675.168967] svm_hardware_enable: efer d01 on 0
> [231675.168972] svm_hardware_enable: efer d01 on 1
> [231675.168983] svm_hardware_enable: efer d01 on 2
> [231675.168995] svm_hardware_enable: efer d01 on 3
>
>
> After reboot, the first kvm run always reports efer = 1d01 on the first cpu.
> In all subsequent runs before reboot efer stays d01 on all cpus.
Happy broken BIOS fun. Oh well, I guess you can live with the patched version
and normal end-users will just update their BIOSes.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
