On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:38:51PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > I am not sure that I am the right person to do such an invasive change.
> > At least not in this patch-set. I could think of removing SVM from the
> > qemu64 definition and add it again in the TCG specific path.
>
> It's not an invasive change and IMHO the only correct one. I'm not
> even sure why it's not done yet - after all the reason for the kvm*
> cpu types is exactly that. Please just add it as an early patch in
> your series.
Okay, if you say its ok I will change it. But if anyone comes to me with
regressions I will send them straight to you :-P
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
