Am 13.09.2010 20:56, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 09/13/2010 01:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Am 13.09.2010 19:54, Avi Kivity wrote: >> >>> The symbol KVM_UPSTREAM is used to mark sections of code that are >>> part of >>> the upstream kvm implemetation that is not used in qemu-kvm. However >>> the >>> name becomes ambiguous if qemu-kvm is merged upstream. >>> >> I doubt this is describing all cases correctly as well. Some changes >> should rather happen the other way around (e.g. you surely don't want to >> obsolete x86 kvm_arch_put/get_registers in favor of >> kvm_arch_load/save_regs, do you?). >> > > There's really no perfect name to describe what we're actually doing > here. It's probably not a detail worth worrying that much about.
I don't mind the name as long as it doesn't reflect the strategy (but why this change at all then?). Jan (who would prefer to have the time for doing the cleanups)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
