On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Alec Joseph Rivera <eij...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 22:37 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Alec Joseph Rivera wrote: >> [] >> >> Inode-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) >> >> Memory: 1022272k/1048564k available (1671k kernel code, 25488k reserved, >> >> 890k data, 200k init, 131064k highmem) >> >> Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... >> >> Ok. >> > -- end >> >> Hm. There was some error with earlier kernels and >> kvm that resulted in exactly this behavour. Maybe >> even a (guest) kernel bug.. no? My memory is vague >> in this area, but it tells there was something... >> > > Hi Michael: > > I suspect has something to do with loops (re: bogomips calibration) or > timers (re: calibration + pci probing). Will verify this when I get the > time to read the source. > > Maybe someone more familiar with this kernel area can shed some light on > the topic too...? :-) only if I'm not stretching too much..
boot with param lpj=xxx to avoid calibration copy xxx value from your normal boot kernel messages > >> /mjt > > > -- > --- > > > Follow me: > http://twitter.com/agirivera > Invite as a > friend: > http://www.facebook.com/agirivera > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Regards dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
