"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote on 10/06/2010 07:04:31 PM:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> > 10/06/2010 07:04 PM > > To > > Krishna Kumar2/India/i...@ibmin > > cc > > ru...@rustcorp.com.au, da...@davemloft.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org, > a...@arndb.de, net...@vger.kernel.org, a...@redhat.com, anth...@codemonkey.ws > > Subject > > Re: [v2 RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:33:07PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote: > > For 1 TCP netperf, I ran 7 iterations and summed it. Explanation > > for degradation for 1 stream case: > > I thought about possible RX/TX contention reasons, and I realized that > we get/put the mm counter all the time. So I write the following: I > haven't seen any performance gain from this in a single queue case, but > maybe this will help multiqueue? Great! I am on vacation tomorrow, but will test with this patch tomorrow night. Thanks, - KK -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
