On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Morton
<a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:55:17 +0800 Dave Young <hidave.darks...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Dave Young <hidave.darks...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Andrew Morton
>> >>
>> >> Also, a slightly better implementation would be
>> >>
>> >> static inline void * vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size, gfp_t flags)
>> >> {
>> >> return vmalloc_node(size, 1, flags, PAGE_KERNEL, -1,
>> >> builtin_return_address(0));
>> >> }
>>
>> Is this better? might vmalloc_node_flags would be used by other than
>> vmalloc?
>>
>> static inline void * vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size, int node,
>> gfp_t flags)
>
> I have no strong opinions, really. If we add more and more arguments
> to vmalloc_node_flags() it ends up looking like vmalloc_node(), so we
> may as well just call vmalloc_node(). Do whatever feels good ;)
Ok, thanks.
Then I would prefer add 'node' argument due to the function name of
vmalloc_node_flags
--
Regards
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
