On 10/23/2010 04:12 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:07:17PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> How do we manage the stable series wrt this issue?
>
> qemu-kvm-0.12.5 has a regression within the stable series that this
> patch fixes. qemu 0.12.5 does not, but only because it does not
> emulate polarity in the I/O APIC correctly.
>
> There are several paths we could take:
>
> - do nothing, bug is fixed in mainline
> - release a seabios 0.x.1 for qemu 0.13.1 with this patch
> - same, plus seabios 0.y.1 for qemu 0.12.6 with this patch
> - skip qemu (which is not truly affected), patch qemu-kvm's copy of
> seabios for both 0.12.z and 0.13.z
>
> The third option is the most "correct" from a release engineering
> point of view, but involves more work for everyone.
I'm okay with making tags and branches of seabios for bug fixes. So
far qemu/kvm has just grabbed various builds of seabios - is it
worthwhile to branch off of the seabios-0.6.1 version - which would
mean qemu/kvm would pull in additional changes beyond the bug fix
above?
qemu 0.12 is based on 0.5.1-stable, appears to be an untagged commit
qemu 0.13 is based on 17d3e46511, doesn't appear to be a part of a
branch or a tag?
git-wise, tags are more important than branches. You can always
retrofit a branch to a tag (and you can always retrofit a tag to a
commit hash). For the qemu git repositories, neither matter so much
since the commit is recorded in git; but the distro people really like
nice stable tags with lots of digits and dots in them.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
