(2010/11/18 14:45), Zachary Amsden wrote:
No, I believe your patch is correct and the lock should be there. Did you test
with spinlock debugging just to be sure?
Sorry but no.
I have no experience with cpu hotplug.
So I thought it would take too much time to do real test by myself and reported
like this this time.
Any easy way to test?
Yes, quite easy. Some systems may not let cpu0 go offline, but you can manually
disable and re-enable the other processors:
[r...@mysore ~]# echo "0" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
[r...@mysore ~]# echo "1" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
Cheers,
Zach
Thanks a lot!
I tried and got a log like this:
kernel: [ 422.084620] kvm: disabling virtualization on CPU1
kernel: [ 422.085757] CPU 1 is now offline
kernel: [ 422.085766] lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
kernel: [ 422.085780] SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
kernel: [ 472.081069] lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
kernel: [ 472.081080] SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code
kernel: [ 472.099182] Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x1
kernel: [ 422.104799] kvm: enabling virtualization on CPU1
Working correctly, I think.
Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
