On 11/23/2010 01:04 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Anthony Liguori (aligu...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> qemu-kvm vcpu threads don't response to SIGSTOP/SIGCONT. Instead of teaching
> them to respond to these signals, introduce monitor commands that stop and
start
> individual vcpus.
In the past SIGSTOP has introduced time skew. Have you verified this
isn't an issue.
Wouldn't we have the same problems with kernel cpu limits? I'd say it
only depends on the period of the controller, not on how it's implemented.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
