Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> writes:

> On 12/06/2010 06:43 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:34 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> >  On 12/06/2010 06:21 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> >  >  v2:
>> >  >    - Reimplement 2/5 to remove more cruft
>> >  >
>> >  >  v1:
>> >  >
>> >  >  Now that we've got PCI capabilities cleaned up and device assignment
>> >  >  using them, we can add more capabilities to be guest visible.  This
>> >  >  adds minimal PCI Express, PCI-X, and Power Management, along with
>> >  >  direct passthrough Vital Product Data and Vendor Specific capabilities.
>> >  >  With this, devices like tg3, bnx2, vxge, and potentially quite a few
>> >  >  others that didn't work previously should be happier.  Thanks,
>> >  >
>> >
>> >  Applied, thanks.  EFAULT is not the best error return, though.
>>
>> Do you prefer EBUSY?  Bad address seemed appropriate here, but I'm not
>> attached to it.  Feel free to change it, or I can send a follow-up.
>> Thanks,
>
> EBUSY isn't descriptive either, but EFAULT is wrong, it's the syscall
> equivalent of a SEGV, which hasn't happened here.  How I hate errno.h.

EEXIST?  EINVAL?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to