On 12/09/2010 07:07 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
Right. May be clearer by using a for () loop instead of the goto.
And open coding kvm_for_each_vcpu ?
Somehow I suspect that won't add to clarity...
No, I meant having a for (pass = 0; pass < 2; ++pass) and nesting
kvm_for_each_vcpu() in it.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
