On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> @@ -943,6 +950,9 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, 
> void *dev_id)
>       /* Make sure it's not being used on another CPU: */
>       synchronize_irq(irq);
>  
> +     if (single_handler)
> +             desc->irq_data.drv_status &= ~IRQS_SHARED;
> +

What's the reason to clear this flag outside of the desc->lock held
region. I need this status for other purposes as well, where I
definitely need serialization.

> +     mutex_lock(&register_lock);
> +
> +     old_action = desc->action;
> +     if (old_action && (old_action->flags & IRQF_ADAPTIVE) &&
> +         !(desc->irq_data.drv_status & IRQS_SHARED)) {
> +             /*
> +              * Signal the old handler that is has to switch to shareable
> +              * handling mode. Disable the line to avoid any conflict with
> +              * a real IRQ.
> +              */
> +             disable_irq(irq);
> +             local_irq_disable();
> +
> +             desc->irq_data.drv_status |= IRQS_SHARED | IRQS_MAKE_SHAREABLE;

Unserialized access as well. Will think about it.

> +             old_action->handler(irq, old_action->dev_id);
> +             desc->irq_data.drv_status &= ~IRQS_MAKE_SHAREABLE;

Thanks,

        tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to