Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:37:57 +0800 > Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Luiz Capitulino >> >> Any problem? > > Sorry for the delay. Looks good in general to me know, there's only one > small problem and it's the error message: > > (qemu) nmi 100 > Parameter 'cpu-index' expects a CPU number > (qemu) > > I would expect that kind of error message when no CPU number is > provided, but in the case above the CPU number is provided but it > happens to be invalid. Why?
This is not Lai Jiangshan's fault. It's what QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE reports. The current design of QError makes it hard to do better. "expects a valid CPU number" could be done, if you think that's better. > By the way, please add an introductory email with proper changelog > when submitting series/patches, so that it's easier to review. Also make sure the parts are threaded together properly with In-Reply-To and References headers, because that helps e-mail readers to keep the parts together. Lack of threading is annoying, and annoying reviewers intentionally would be rude :) Suggested workflow: git-format-patch --cover-letter -ns ... look over patch files, edit the cover letter to taste git-send-email --to qemu-de...@nongnu.org 0*.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
