On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 04:21:23PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:13:17AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Hi Gleb,
> >
> > Thats a neat idea.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:52:03PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > KVM does not hold any references to rcu protected data when it switches
> > > CPU into a guest mode. In fact switching to a guest mode is very similar
> > > to exiting to userspase from rcu point of view. In addition CPU may stay
> > > in a guest mode for quite a long time (up to one time slice). Lets treat
> > > guest mode as quiescent state, just like we do with user-mode execution.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > > index 0bc3d37..a347bce 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > > @@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ static inline void kvm_guest_enter(void)
> > > {
> > > account_system_vtime(current);
> > > current->flags |= PF_VCPU;
> > > + rcu_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline void kvm_guest_exit(void)
> > > --
> > > 1.7.2.3
> >
> > Please have it in x86's vcpu_enter_guest, then its more explicit
> > (uncertain about the context of kvm_guest_enter call in other arches).
> >
> I checked all of them and kvm_guest_enter() is always called with local
> irq disabled. Paul confirmed that rcu_note_context_switch() can be
> called in such context.
OK then. Perhaps have an assert to verify interrupts are disabled?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
