* Sasha Levin <levinsasha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> @@ -511,7 +515,13 @@ int kvm_cmd_run(int argc, const char **argv, const char 
> *prefix)
>       kvm->nrcpus = nrcpus;
>  
>       memset(real_cmdline, 0, sizeof(real_cmdline));
> -     strcpy(real_cmdline, "notsc noapic noacpi pci=conf1 console=ttyS0 
> earlyprintk=serial");
> +     strcpy(real_cmdline, "notsc noapic noacpi pci=conf1");
> +     if (vnc) {
> +             strcat(real_cmdline, " video=vesafb console=tty0");
> +             vidmode = 0x312;
> +     } else {
> +             strcat(real_cmdline, " console=ttyS0 earlyprintk=serial");
> +     }

Hm, i think all the kernel parameter handling code wants to move into driver 
specific routines as well. Something like:

        serial_init(kvm, real_cmdline);

where serial_init() would append to real_cmdline if needed.

This removes a bit of serial-driver specific knowledge from kvm-run.c.

Same goes for the VESA driver and the above video mode flag logic.

> @@ -597,6 +607,9 @@ int kvm_cmd_run(int argc, const char **argv, const char 
> *prefix)
>  
>       kvm__init_ram(kvm);
>  
> +     if (vnc)
> +             vesa__init(kvm);

Shouldnt vesa__init() itself know about whether it's active (i.e. the 'vnc' 
flag is set) and return early if it's not set?

That way this could become more encapsulated and self-sufficient:

        vesa__init(kvm);

With no VESA driver specific state exposed to the generic kvm_cmd_run() 
function.

Ideally kvm_cmd_run() hould just be a series of:

        serial_init(kvm, real_cmdline);
        vesa_init(kvm, real_cmdline);
        ...

initialization routines. Later on even this could be removed: using section 
tricks we can put init functions into a section and drivers could register 
their init function like initcall(func) functions are registered within the 
kernel. kvm_cmd_run() could thus iterate over that (build time constructed) 
section like this:

extern initcall_t __initcall_start[], __initcall_end[], __early_initcall_end[];

static void __init do_initcalls(void)
{
        initcall_t *fn;

        for (fn = __early_initcall_end; fn < __initcall_end; fn++)
                do_one_initcall(*fn);
}

and would not actually have *any* knowledge about what drivers were built in.

Currently it's fine to initialize everything explicitly - but this would be the 
long term model to work towards ...

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to