On 06/05/2011 07:25 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>
>> An additional advantage is that this is a vm ioctl, not a vcpu ioctl, so
>> no need to interrupt the vcpu thread in userspace in order to queue an
>> interrupt. Of course, it still happens in the kernel, but it's easier
>> for userspace to implement its device model this way.
>
> So supporting this over existing archs would have some benefits as well,
> though a bit smaller if in-kernel irqchip is already implemented.
>
Could you elaborate what you mean here? I'm not really following. Are
you suggesting a new arch-generic interface? (Pardon my ignorance).
Using KVM_IRQ_LINE everywhere except s390, not just in x86 and ARM.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html