On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:15:33AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:56:37PM -0400, Umesh Deshpande wrote: > > ramlist mutex is implemented to protect the RAMBlock list traversal in the > > migration thread from their addition/removal from the iothread. > > > > Signed-off-by: Umesh Deshpande <udesh...@redhat.com> > > --- > > cpu-all.h | 2 ++ > > exec.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > qemu-common.h | 2 ++ > > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/cpu-all.h b/cpu-all.h > > index 6b217a2..eab9803 100644 > > --- a/cpu-all.h > > +++ b/cpu-all.h > > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ > > > > #include "qemu-common.h" > > #include "cpu-common.h" > > +#include "qemu-thread.h" > > > > /* some important defines: > > * > > @@ -932,6 +933,7 @@ typedef struct RAMBlock { > > } RAMBlock; > > > > typedef struct RAMList { > > + QemuMutex mutex; > > uint8_t *phys_dirty; > > QLIST_HEAD(ram, RAMBlock) blocks; > > QLIST_HEAD(, RAMBlock) blocks_mru; > > A comment on what the mutex protects would be good.
And on the lock ordering. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html