On 22/09/11 12:08, Amit Shah wrote: >> + /* If there was an early virtio console, assume that there are no >> + * other consoles. We need to wait until the hvc_alloc matches the >> + * hvc_instantiate, otherwise tty_open will complain, resulting in >> + * a "Warning: unable to open an initial console" boot failure. >> + * Without multiport this is done in add_port above. With multiport >> + * this might take some host<->guest communication - thus we have to >> + * wait. */ > > This file uses comments in the form > /* > * ... > */
Will fix. > >> + if (multiport && early) >> + wait_for_completion(&port_added); >> + > > Can there be a problem to not timeout this wait? Maybe it's not a > real problem; just thinking out aloud. I had the same thoughts. I then asked myself, how big the timeout has to be - and the answer was it really depends on the host load. So we can certainly use wait_for_completion_timeout(&port_added, HZ*<x>); which will work in 99.9% of all cases. It might still cause spurious boot failures, if for some reasons it takes too long. So the big question is, is there a case were virtio is used as an early console but virtio_console does not register a console during probe. Ideas? Christian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
