On 10/24/2011 04:50 AM, Alex,Shi wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 15:34 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote: > > percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them > > for further code clean up. > > > > And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better > > performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable() > > > > Avi: > Would you like to give some comments of this? >
Sorry, was travelling: Acked-by: Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
