Hi Ted,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Ted Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu> wrote:
> And the same problems will exist with kvm-tool. What if you need to
> release a new version of kvm-tool? Does that mean that you have to
> release a new set of kernel binaries? It's a mess, and there's a
> reason why we don't have glibc, e2fsprogs, xfsprogs, util-linux-ng,
> etc., all packaged into the kernel sources.
If we need to release a new version, patches would go through the
-stable tree just like with any other subsystem.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Ted Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu> wrote:
> Because it's a stupid, idiotic thing to do.
The discussion is turning into whether or not linux/tools makes sense
or not. I wish you guys would have had it before perf was merged to
the tree.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
